The takeaway
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF shows a moderate seasonal pattern over 10 years of data — strongest in November (+2.3%) and softest in February (−0.7%).
Right now
In July, the fund has risen 90% of years, averaging +2.0% — essentially in line with the S&P 500.
The full picture
iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF's most dependable month has been November, higher in 9 of 10 years; February has been its least reliable, up just 50% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 |
Month by month
The fund's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in January (+1.2 pts); it has trailed the market most in October (−1.4 pts).
“vs S&P” is iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, November has closed higher 80% of the time versus 90% across the last 10 years — the pattern is holding.
Figures are the typical (median) November return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 10(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 10-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
This is a fund you can almost set a calendar by, and November is the anchor — it has closed higher in 9 of 10 Novembers, the steadiest beat on its year.
A typical November brings +0.9%, a shade under the +2.3% average. Set against the S&P 500, mind, November is close to a wash — the gain mirrors the market more than it beats it. Few peers keep such company in November — the typical stock clears it just 62% of the time.
November anchors a run, too: the November-through-January window has been the fund's reliable season. At the other end of the calendar, February has been the soft spot — the weakest of 2 months that average a loss (−0.7%), and the edge isn't year-round — the fund has trailed the S&P 500 in October, March, and April. Its roughest month on record was a −10.9% March in 2020 — a reminder of how hard even a seasonal name can fall.
Reassuringly, the tendency has held its shape: the recent five years still track the years behind them.
For a fund this dependable in November, the sharper question is the rest of the year — outside its strong stretch, the calendar gives far less to lean on.
Short answers on the fund's best month (November), its worst (February), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Yes, to a moderate degree. Since 2016 its best month (November, +2.3%) has run well ahead of its worst (February, −0.7%) — the heatmap above shows how steady that gap has been year to year.
November has been the strongest, averaging +2.3% and closing higher in 9 of 10 years since 2016.
It's the weakest, averaging −0.7% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade