The takeaway
ActivePassive International Equity ETF shows a moderate seasonal pattern over 3 years of data — strongest in February (+3.4%) and softest in October (−2.2%).
Right now
In July, the fund has risen 67% of years, averaging +1.2%, roughly 1.0 pts behind the S&P 500.
The full picture
ActivePassive International Equity ETF's most dependable month has been February, higher in 2 of 2 years; October has been its least reliable, up just 0% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | — | — | — |
Month by month
The fund's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in February (+3.6 pts); it has trailed the market most in October (−3.2 pts).
“vs S&P” is ActivePassive International Equity ETF’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating ActivePassive International Equity ETF’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Not enough recent February history to say whether the pattern still holds.
Figures are the typical (median) February return and how often it rose — the last 2 years versus the last 3(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 3-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
Dependability is the through-line here. February stands out, higher in all 2 Februaries, but it heads a clutch of months that pull the year reliably upward.
Its average (+3.4%) and median (+3.4%) land within a hair of each other — the tell of steady, year-after-year gains rather than one outlier doing the work. It is also the calendar's calmest month, its returns swinging least from year to year (a 0.9% spread), and even its worst February in 3 years lost only 2.5% — the gentlest downside anywhere on its calendar. Crucially, the gain is the fund's own rather than a rising tide's: February has cleared the S&P 500 by +3.6 points above the index. It bucks the broad tape, besides: February lifts just 49% of stocks across the market.
A few other months pull their weight: May, June, and July have also closed higher more often than not. The weaker half of the year is plainer: October has been the soft spot — the only month to average an outright loss (−2.2%), and the edge isn't year-round — the fund has trailed the S&P 500 in October, April, and July.
The takeaway is less about when to buy than what to expect: February aside, the fund's months offer little reliable tilt. With a short 3-year record, the signal is best held loosely.
Short answers on the fund's best month (February), its worst (October), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Yes, to a moderate degree. Since 2023 its best month (February, +3.4%) has run well ahead of its worst (October, −2.2%) — the heatmap above shows how steady that gap has been year to year.
February has been the strongest, averaging +3.4% and closing higher in all 2 years on record since 2023.
It's the weakest, averaging −2.2% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade