The takeaway
Northern Lights Fund Trust IV - Inspire 100 ETF shows a moderate seasonal pattern over 9 years of data — strongest in November (+3.8%) and softest in February (−1.2%).
Right now
In July, the fund has risen 88% of years, averaging +3.5%, about +1.3 pts better than the S&P 500.
The full picture
Northern Lights Fund Trust IV - Inspire 100 ETF's most dependable month has been November, higher in 8 of 9 years; February has been its least reliable, up just 38% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Month by month
The fund's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in January (+2.9 pts); it has trailed the market most in March (−1.8 pts).
“vs S&P” is Northern Lights Fund Trust IV - Inspire 100 ETF’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating Northern Lights Fund Trust IV - Inspire 100 ETF’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, November has closed higher 80% of the time versus 89% across the last 9 years — the pattern is strengthening.
Figures are the typical (median) November return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 9(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 9-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
Dependability is the through-line here. November stands out, higher in 8 of 9 Novembers, but it heads a clutch of months that pull the year reliably upward.
The headline flatters a touch — its +3.8% average sits well above the +2.3% a typical year delivers, the work of a few big Novembers. It is among its calmest months, too, its returns swinging least from year to year (a 3.8% spread). Crucially, the gain is the fund's own rather than a rising tide's: November has cleared the S&P 500 by +1.5 points above the index. That consistency sets it apart from the field, where the average stock manages November only about 62% of the time.
The strength clusters rather than stands alone — November–January forms a firm stretch that carries much of the year. On the other side of the ledger, February has been the soft spot — the weakest of 3 months that average a loss (−1.2%), and the edge isn't year-round — the fund has trailed the S&P 500 in March, October, and December. Its roughest month on record was a −16.2% March in 2020 — a reminder of how hard even a seasonal name can fall.
If anything it has sharpened recently — the last five Novembers run ahead of the earlier years.
The takeaway is less about when to buy than what to expect: November aside, the fund's months offer little reliable tilt. With a short 9-year record, the signal is best held loosely.
Short answers on the fund's best month (November), its worst (February), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Yes, to a moderate degree. Since 2017 its best month (November, +3.8%) has run well ahead of its worst (February, −1.2%) — the heatmap above shows how steady that gap has been year to year.
November has been the strongest, averaging +3.8% and closing higher in 8 of 9 years since 2017.
It's the weakest, averaging −1.2% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade