The takeaway
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF shows a slight seasonal lean over 10 years of data — strongest in April (+1.7%) and softest in June (−0.3%).
Right now
In July, the fund has risen 78% of years, averaging +1.6%, roughly 0.5 pts behind the S&P 500.
The full picture
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF's most dependable month has been April, higher in 7 of 9 years; June has been its least reliable, up just 44% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Month by month
The fund's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in January (+2.3 pts); it has trailed the market most in October (−1.8 pts).
“vs S&P” is iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, April has closed higher 60% of the time versus 78% across the last 10 years — the pattern is weakening.
Figures are the typical (median) April return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 10(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 10-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
Dependability is the through-line here. April stands out, higher in 7 of 9 Aprils, but it heads a clutch of months that pull the year reliably upward.
Its average (+1.7%) and median (+1.9%) land within a hair of each other — the tell of steady, year-after-year gains rather than one outlier doing the work. Set against the S&P 500, mind, April is close to a wash — the gain mirrors the market more than it beats it. That consistency sets it apart from the field, where the average stock manages April only about 55% of the time.
The strength clusters rather than stands alone — March–May forms a firm stretch that carries much of the year. At the other end of the calendar, June is the year's quietest corner, essentially flat on average, and the edge isn't year-round — the fund has trailed the S&P 500 in October, March, and February. Its roughest month on record was a −15.2% March in 2020 — a reminder of how hard even a seasonal name can fall.
The pattern has softened of late, April's last five years slipping below its longer-run record.
The takeaway is less about when to buy than what to expect: April aside, the fund's months offer little reliable tilt.
Short answers on the fund's best month (April), its worst (June), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Only mildly. The fund's months are fairly even — April is the firmest (+1.7%) and June the softest (−0.3%), a narrow spread that points to weak seasonality rather than a strong calendar effect.
April has been the strongest, averaging +1.7% and closing higher in 7 of 9 years since 2016.
It's the weakest, averaging −0.3% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade