The takeaway
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN shows a pronounced seasonal pattern over 7 years of data — strongest in June (+5.6%) and softest in September (−2.4%).
Right now
In July, the fund has risen 67% of years, averaging +3.6%, about +1.4 pts better than the S&P 500.
The full picture
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN's most dependable month has been June, higher in 5 of 6 years; September has been its least reliable, up just 33% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Month by month
The fund's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in May (+5.6 pts); it has trailed the market most in March (−2.9 pts).
“vs S&P” is MicroSectors FANG+ ETN’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating MicroSectors FANG+ ETN’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, June has closed higher 80% of the time versus 83% across the last 7 years — the pattern is holding.
Figures are the typical (median) June return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 7(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 7-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
This is a fund you can almost set a calendar by, and June is the anchor — it has closed higher in 5 of 6 Junes, the steadiest beat on its year.
The strength looks broad-based rather than freakish: its average (+5.6%) and median (+7.0%) sit close together, so no single blow-out year is flattering the figure. No month is steadier: June's returns vary by just 5.1% year to year. Better still, that strength is the fund's own and not just a buoyant market — June has outpaced the S&P 500 by +5.4 points on average. Few peers keep such company in June — the typical stock clears it just 52% of the time.
June anchors a run, too: the May-through-August window has been the fund's reliable season. At the other end of the calendar, September has been the soft spot — the weakest of 3 months that average a loss (−2.4%), and the edge isn't year-round — the fund has trailed the S&P 500 in March, September, and February. Its roughest month on record was a −19.5% April in 2022 — a reminder of how hard even a seasonal name can fall.
Reassuringly, the tendency has held its shape: the recent five years still track the years behind them.
For a fund this dependable in June, the sharper question is the rest of the year — outside its strong stretch, the calendar gives far less to lean on. With a short 7-year record, the signal is best held loosely.
Short answers on the fund's best month (June), its worst (September), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Yes, to a pronounced degree. Since 2019 its best month (June, +5.6%) has run well ahead of its worst (September, −2.4%) — the heatmap above shows how steady that gap has been year to year.
June has been the strongest, averaging +5.6% and closing higher in 5 of 6 years since 2019.
It's the weakest, averaging −2.4% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade