The takeaway
First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities and Income ETF shows a moderate seasonal pattern over 9 years of data — strongest in July (+1.8%) and softest in March (−2.8%).
Right now
In July, the fund has risen 100% of years, averaging +1.8% — essentially in line with the S&P 500.
The full picture
First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities and Income ETF's most dependable month has been July, higher in 8 of 8 years; March has been its least reliable, up just 25% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Month by month
The fund's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in January (+1.6 pts); it has trailed the market most in March (−3.8 pts).
“vs S&P” is First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities and Income ETF’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities and Income ETF’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, July has closed higher 100% of the time versus 100% across the last 9 years — the pattern is holding.
Figures are the typical (median) July return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 9(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 9-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
This is a fund you can almost set a calendar by, and July is the anchor — it has closed higher in all 8 Julys, the steadiest beat on its year.
The strength looks broad-based rather than freakish: its average (+1.8%) and median (+1.6%) sit close together, so no single blow-out year is flattering the figure. Few months are steadier: July's returns vary by just 1.0% year to year, and even its worst July in 9 years lost only 0.3% — the gentlest downside anywhere on its calendar. Set against the S&P 500, mind, July is close to a wash — the gain mirrors the market more than it beats it. Few peers keep such company in July — the typical stock clears it just 61% of the time.
July anchors a run, too: the April-through-August window has been the fund's reliable season. At the other end of the calendar, March has been the soft spot — the only month to average an outright loss (−2.8%), and the edge isn't year-round — the fund has trailed the S&P 500 in March, November, and October. Its roughest month on record was a −14.6% March in 2020 — a reminder of how hard even a seasonal name can fall.
July has now closed higher 8 years running. Reassuringly, the tendency has held its shape: the recent five years still track the years behind them.
For a fund this dependable in July, the sharper question is the rest of the year — outside its strong stretch, the calendar gives far less to lean on. With a short 9-year record, the signal is best held loosely.
Short answers on the fund's best month (July), its worst (March), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Yes, to a moderate degree. Since 2017 its best month (July, +1.8%) has run well ahead of its worst (March, −2.8%) — the heatmap above shows how steady that gap has been year to year.
July has been the strongest, averaging +1.8% and closing higher in all 8 years on record since 2017.
It's the weakest, averaging −2.8% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade