The takeaway
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC) shows a moderate seasonal pattern over 10 years of data — strongest in October (+15.8%) and softest in August (+9.8%).
Right now
In July, the fund has risen 80% of years, averaging +7.5%, about +5.4 pts better than the S&P 500.
The full picture
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC)'s most dependable month has been October, higher in 8 of 10 years; August has been its least reliable, up just 30% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 |
Month by month
The fund's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in May (+23.2 pts); it has trailed the market most in September (−5.5 pts).
“vs S&P” is Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC)’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC)’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, October has closed higher 80% of the time versus 80% across the last 10 years — the pattern is holding.
Figures are the typical (median) October return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 10(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 10-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
This is a fund you can almost set a calendar by, and October is the anchor — it has closed higher in 8 of 10 Octobers, the steadiest beat on its year.
The strength looks broad-based rather than freakish: its average (+15.8%) and median (+14.9%) sit close together, so no single blow-out year is flattering the figure. Few months are steadier: October's returns vary by just 17.3% year to year, and even its worst October in 10 years lost only 12.8% — the gentlest downside anywhere on its calendar. Better still, that strength is the fund's own and not just a buoyant market — October has outpaced the S&P 500 by +14.8 points on average. Few peers keep such company in October — the typical stock clears it just 53% of the time.
It doesn't stand entirely alone — February, April, and May have leaned firm as well, if less emphatically. On the other side of the ledger, August is the year's low point, though even there the fund has stayed positive on average (+9.8%), a sign every month leans up, and the edge isn't year-round — the fund has trailed the S&P 500 in September, January, and March. Its roughest month on record was a −42.0% March in 2018 — a reminder of how hard even a seasonal name can fall.
One run worth flagging just ended: a 6-year streak of positive Octobers was snapped by a −6.7% close in 2025. Reassuringly, the tendency has held its shape: the recent five years still track the years behind them.
For a fund this dependable in October, the sharper question is the rest of the year — outside its strong stretch, the calendar gives far less to lean on. With returns that swing hard year to year, the signal is best held loosely.
Short answers on the fund's best month (October), its worst (August), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Yes, to a moderate degree. Since 2016 its best month (October, +15.8%) has run well ahead of its worst (August, +9.8%) — the heatmap above shows how steady that gap has been year to year.
October has been the strongest, averaging +15.8% and closing higher in 8 of 10 years since 2016.
It's the weakest month, but it has still averaged a small gain (+9.8%) — quiet rather than genuinely bad.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade