The takeaway
abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF shows a slight seasonal lean over 10 years of data — strongest in January (+2.1%) and softest in November (−0.5%).
Right now
In July, the fund has risen 70% of years, averaging +3.1%, about +0.9 pts better than the S&P 500.
The full picture
abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF's most dependable month has been January, higher in 8 of 10 years; November has been its least reliable, up just 30% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 |
Month by month
The fund's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in January (+2.3 pts); it has trailed the market most in November (−2.9 pts).
“vs S&P” is abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, January has closed higher 60% of the time versus 80% across the last 10 years — the pattern is weakening.
Figures are the typical (median) January return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 10(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 10-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
Dependability is the through-line here. January stands out, higher in 8 of 10 Januaries, but it heads a clutch of months that pull the year reliably upward.
Its average (+2.1%) and median (+2.8%) land within a hair of each other — the tell of steady, year-after-year gains rather than one outlier doing the work. It is also the calendar's calmest month, its returns swinging least from year to year (a 3.1% spread). Crucially, the gain is the fund's own rather than a rising tide's: January has cleared the S&P 500 by +2.3 points above the index. That consistency sets it apart from the field, where the average stock manages January only about 53% of the time.
A few other months pull their weight: April, May, and July have also closed higher more often than not. At the other end of the calendar, November has been the soft spot — the weakest of 2 months that average a loss (−0.5%), and the edge isn't year-round — the fund has trailed the S&P 500 in November and September.
The pattern has softened of late, January's last five years slipping below its longer-run record.
The takeaway is less about when to buy than what to expect: January aside, the fund's months offer little reliable tilt.
Short answers on the fund's best month (January), its worst (November), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Only mildly. The fund's months are fairly even — January is the firmest (+2.1%) and November the softest (−0.5%), a narrow spread that points to weak seasonality rather than a strong calendar effect.
January has been the strongest, averaging +2.1% and closing higher in 8 of 10 years since 2016.
It's the weakest, averaging −0.5% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade