The takeaway
SPDR® S&P China ETF shows a moderate seasonal pattern over 10 years of data — strongest in May (+0.2%) and softest in October (−2.9%).
Right now
In July, the fund has risen 50% of years, averaging +0.4%, roughly 1.7 pts behind the S&P 500.
The full picture
SPDR® S&P China ETF's most dependable month has been May, higher in 8 of 10 years; October has been its least reliable, up just 40% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 |
Month by month
The fund's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in January (+2.2 pts); it has trailed the market most in October (−3.9 pts).
“vs S&P” is SPDR® S&P China ETF’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating SPDR® S&P China ETF’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, May has closed higher 80% of the time versus 80% across the last 10 years — the pattern is holding.
Figures are the typical (median) May return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 10(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 10-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
This is a fund you can almost set a calendar by, and May is the anchor — it has closed higher in 8 of 10 Mays, the steadiest beat on its year.
The strength looks broad-based rather than freakish: its average (+0.2%) and median (+2.4%) sit close together, so no single blow-out year is flattering the figure. Few peers keep such company in May — the typical stock clears it just 55% of the time.
It doesn't stand entirely alone — January, February, and June have leaned firm as well, if less emphatically. At the other end of the calendar, October has been the soft spot — the weakest of 3 months that average a loss (−2.9%), and the edge isn't year-round — the fund has trailed the S&P 500 in October, March, and April. Its roughest month on record was a −15.0% October in 2022 — a reminder of how hard even a seasonal name can fall.
Reassuringly, the tendency has held its shape: the recent five years still track the years behind them.
For a fund this dependable in May, the sharper question is the rest of the year — outside its strong stretch, the calendar gives far less to lean on.
Short answers on the fund's best month (May), its worst (October), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Yes, to a moderate degree. Since 2016 its best month (May, +0.2%) has run well ahead of its worst (October, −2.9%) — the heatmap above shows how steady that gap has been year to year.
May has been the strongest, averaging +0.2% and closing higher in 8 of 10 years since 2016.
It's the weakest, averaging −2.9% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade