The takeaway
Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF shows a moderate seasonal pattern over 10 years of data — strongest in July (+1.7%) and softest in February (−1.6%).
Right now
In July, the fund has risen 80% of years, averaging +1.7% — essentially in line with the S&P 500.
The full picture
Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF's most dependable month has been July, higher in 8 of 10 years; February has been its least reliable, up just 20% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 |
Month by month
The fund's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in January (+1.3 pts); it has trailed the market most in October (−1.7 pts).
“vs S&P” is Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating Invesco International Corporate Bond ETF’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, July has closed higher 80% of the time versus 80% across the last 10 years — the pattern is holding.
Figures are the typical (median) July return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 10(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 10-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
The seasonal story is really one month's story — July. It has closed higher in 8 of 10 Julys, a concentration the rest of the calendar can't touch.
The strength looks broad-based rather than freakish: its average (+1.7%) and median (+2.1%) sit close together, so no single blow-out year is flattering the figure. Set against the S&P 500, mind, July is close to a wash — the gain mirrors the market more than it beats it. Few peers keep such company in July — the typical stock clears it just 61% of the time.
It doesn't stand entirely alone — January, March, and April have leaned firm as well, if less emphatically. On the other side of the ledger, February has been the soft spot — the weakest of 4 months that average a loss (−1.6%), and the edge isn't year-round — the fund has trailed the S&P 500 in October, February, and September.
One run worth flagging just ended: a 5-year streak of positive Julys was snapped by a −3.3% close in 2025. Reassuringly, the tendency has held its shape: the recent five years still track the years behind them.
For a fund this dependable in July, the sharper question is the rest of the year — outside its strong stretch, the calendar gives far less to lean on.
Short answers on the fund's best month (July), its worst (February), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Yes, to a moderate degree. Since 2016 its best month (July, +1.7%) has run well ahead of its worst (February, −1.6%) — the heatmap above shows how steady that gap has been year to year.
July has been the strongest, averaging +1.7% and closing higher in 8 of 10 years since 2016.
It's the weakest, averaging −1.6% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade