The takeaway
ProShares Short Russell2000 shows a moderate seasonal pattern over 10 years of data — strongest in March (+2.2%) and softest in November (−4.5%).
Right now
In July, the fund has fallen 20% of years, averaging −3.0%, roughly 5.2 pts behind the S&P 500.
The full picture
ProShares Short Russell2000's most dependable month has been March, higher in 6 of 10 years; November has been its least reliable, up just 20% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 |
Month by month
The fund's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in March (+1.2 pts); it has trailed the market most in November (−6.8 pts).
“vs S&P” is ProShares Short Russell2000’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating ProShares Short Russell2000’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, March has closed higher 60% of the time versus 60% across the last 10 years — the pattern is holding.
Figures are the typical (median) March return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 10(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 10-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
There's a real but measured seasonal tilt here, toward March — the firmest corner of the calendar, higher in 6 of 10 Marches.
The strength looks broad-based rather than freakish: its average (+2.2%) and median (+1.4%) sit close together, so no single blow-out year is flattering the figure. Better still, that strength is the fund's own and not just a buoyant market — March has outpaced the S&P 500 by +1.2 points on average.
On the other side of the ledger, November has been the soft spot — the weakest of 6 months that average a loss (−4.5%), and the edge isn't year-round — the fund has trailed the S&P 500 in November, July, and April. Its roughest month on record was a −20.2% April in 2020 — a reminder of how hard even a seasonal name can fall.
Reassuringly, the tendency has held its shape: the recent five years still track the years behind them.
Treat it as a tendency rather than a rule — seasonality describes the past, not a promise.
Short answers on the fund's best month (March), its worst (November), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Yes, to a moderate degree. Since 2016 its best month (March, +2.2%) has run well ahead of its worst (November, −4.5%) — the heatmap above shows how steady that gap has been year to year.
March has been the strongest, averaging +2.2% and closing higher in 6 of 10 years since 2016.
It's the weakest, averaging −4.5% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade