The takeaway
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp shows a slight seasonal lean over 10 years of data — strongest in February (−4.0%) and softest in October (−6.8%).
Right now
In July, the stock has fallen 40% of years, averaging −3.7%, roughly 5.9 pts behind the S&P 500.
The full picture
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp's most dependable month has been February, higher in 7 of 10 years; October has been its least reliable, up just 20% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 |
Month by month
The stock's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in January (+12.0 pts); it has trailed the market most in March (−15.8 pts).
“vs S&P” is Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, February has closed higher 100% of the time versus 70% across the last 10 years — the pattern is strengthening.
Figures are the typical (median) February return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 10(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 10-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
The seasonal story is really one month's story — February. It has closed higher in 7 of 10 Februaries, a concentration the rest of the calendar can't touch.
The strength looks broad-based rather than freakish: its average (−4.0%) and median (+4.0%) sit close together, so no single blow-out year is flattering the figure. Few months are steadier: February's returns vary by just 17.2% year to year. It is the more striking for the company it keeps — February is a losing month for most of the market, where barely 49% of names gain ground.
It doesn't stand entirely alone — August and November have leaned firm as well, if less emphatically. On the other side of the ledger, October has been the soft spot — the weakest of 7 months that average a loss (−6.8%), and the edge isn't year-round — the stock has trailed the S&P 500 in March, May, and December. Its roughest month on record was a −73.7% May in 2019 — a reminder of how hard even a seasonal name can fall.
February has now closed higher 5 years running. If anything it has sharpened recently — the last five Februaries run ahead of the earlier years.
For a stock this dependable in February, the sharper question is the rest of the year — outside its strong stretch, the calendar gives far less to lean on. With returns that swing hard year to year, the signal is best held loosely.
Short answers on the stock's best month (February), its worst (October), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Only mildly. The stock's months are fairly even — February is the firmest (−4.0%) and October the softest (−6.8%), a narrow spread that points to weak seasonality rather than a strong calendar effect.
February has been the strongest, averaging −4.0% and closing higher in 7 of 10 years since 2016.
It's the weakest, averaging −6.8% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade