The takeaway
Unilever PLC ADR shows a moderate seasonal pattern over 10 years of data — strongest in April (+3.8%) and softest in February (−1.8%).
Right now
In July, the stock has risen 60% of years, averaging +2.8%, about +0.6 pts better than the S&P 500.
The full picture
Unilever PLC ADR's most dependable month has been April, higher in 9 of 10 years; February has been its least reliable, up just 20% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 |
Month by month
The stock's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in April (+2.2 pts); it has trailed the market most in October (−3.9 pts).
“vs S&P” is Unilever PLC ADR’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating Unilever PLC ADR’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, April has closed higher 80% of the time versus 90% across the last 10 years — the pattern is holding.
Figures are the typical (median) April return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 10(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 10-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
Strip the year back and a single month does the heavy lifting: April, up in 9 of 10 Aprils while the other eleven tend to blur together.
Its average (+3.8%) and median (+4.7%) land within a hair of each other — the tell of steady, year-after-year gains rather than one outlier doing the work. It is also the calendar's calmest month, its returns swinging least from year to year (a 2.3% spread), and even its worst April in 10 years lost only 0.7% — the gentlest downside anywhere on its calendar. Crucially, the gain is the stock's own rather than a rising tide's: April has cleared the S&P 500 by +2.2 points above the index. That consistency sets it apart from the field, where the average stock manages April only about 55% of the time.
The strength clusters rather than stands alone — March–May forms a firm stretch that carries much of the year. The weaker half of the year is plainer: February has been the soft spot — the weakest of 4 months that average a loss (−1.8%), and the edge isn't year-round — the stock has trailed the S&P 500 in October, September, and December. Its roughest month on record was a −11.7% October in 2016 — a reminder of how hard even a seasonal name can fall.
Reassuringly, the tendency has held its shape: the recent five years still track the years behind them.
The takeaway is less about when to buy than what to expect: April aside, the stock's months offer little reliable tilt.
Short answers on the stock's best month (April), its worst (February), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Yes, to a moderate degree. Since 2016 its best month (April, +3.8%) has run well ahead of its worst (February, −1.8%) — the heatmap above shows how steady that gap has been year to year.
April has been the strongest, averaging +3.8% and closing higher in 9 of 10 years since 2016.
It's the weakest, averaging −1.8% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade