The takeaway
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF shows a slight seasonal lean over 10 years of data — strongest in May (+4.3%) and softest in October (+3.3%).
Right now
In July, the fund has risen 70% of years, averaging +3.9%, about +1.8 pts better than the S&P 500.
The full picture
Global X MSCI Argentina ETF's most dependable month has been May, higher in 8 of 10 years; October has been its least reliable, up just 30% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 |
Month by month
The fund's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in January (+4.8 pts); it has trailed the market most in March (−2.7 pts).
“vs S&P” is Global X MSCI Argentina ETF’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating Global X MSCI Argentina ETF’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, May has closed higher 80% of the time versus 80% across the last 10 years — the pattern is holding.
Figures are the typical (median) May return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 10(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 10-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
The seasonal story is really one month's story — May. It has closed higher in 8 of 10 Mays, a concentration the rest of the calendar can't touch.
The strength looks broad-based rather than freakish: its average (+4.3%) and median (+3.8%) sit close together, so no single blow-out year is flattering the figure. That reliability comes with real swings, mind — even May ranges by 8.9% from year to year, so any single year can land far from the average. Better still, that strength is the fund's own and not just a buoyant market — May has outpaced the S&P 500 by +3.6 points on average. Few peers keep such company in May — the typical stock clears it just 55% of the time.
It doesn't stand entirely alone — July, November, and December have leaned firm as well, if less emphatically. At the other end of the calendar, October is the year's low point, though even there the fund has stayed positive on average (+3.3%), a sign every month leans up, and the edge isn't year-round — the fund has trailed the S&P 500 in March, September, and February. Its roughest month on record was a −31.0% March in 2020 — a reminder of how hard even a seasonal name can fall.
Reassuringly, the tendency has held its shape: the recent five years still track the years behind them.
For a fund this dependable in May, the sharper question is the rest of the year — outside its strong stretch, the calendar gives far less to lean on.
Short answers on the fund's best month (May), its worst (October), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Only mildly. The fund's months are fairly even — May is the firmest (+4.3%) and October the softest (+3.3%), a narrow spread that points to weak seasonality rather than a strong calendar effect.
May has been the strongest, averaging +4.3% and closing higher in 8 of 10 years since 2016.
It's the weakest month, but it has still averaged a small gain (+3.3%) — quiet rather than genuinely bad.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade