The takeaway
Ultra Clean Holdings Inc shows a pronounced seasonal pattern over 10 years of data — strongest in May (+9.9%) and softest in February (−4.9%).
Right now
In July, the stock has risen 60% of years, averaging +6.4%, about +4.3 pts better than the S&P 500.
The full picture
Ultra Clean Holdings Inc's most dependable month has been May, higher in 8 of 10 years; February has been its least reliable, up just 40% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 |
Month by month
The stock's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in May (+9.2 pts); it has trailed the market most in February (−4.7 pts).
“vs S&P” is Ultra Clean Holdings Inc’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating Ultra Clean Holdings Inc’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, May has closed higher 100% of the time versus 80% across the last 10 years — the pattern is strengthening.
Figures are the typical (median) May return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 10(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 10-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
The seasonal story is really one month's story — May. It has closed higher in 8 of 10 Mays, a concentration the rest of the calendar can't touch.
The strength looks broad-based rather than freakish: its average (+9.9%) and median (+8.4%) sit close together, so no single blow-out year is flattering the figure. No month is steadier: May's returns vary by just 8.6% year to year, and even its worst May in 10 years lost only 0.2% — the gentlest downside anywhere on its calendar. Better still, that strength is the stock's own and not just a buoyant market — May has outpaced the S&P 500 by +9.2 points on average. Few peers keep such company in May — the typical stock clears it just 55% of the time.
It doesn't stand entirely alone — January, July, and November have leaned firm as well, if less emphatically. The weaker half of the year is plainer: February has been the soft spot — the weakest of 4 months that average a loss (−4.9%), and the edge isn't year-round — the stock has trailed the S&P 500 in February, August, and April. Its roughest month on record was a −35.6% March in 2020 — a reminder of how hard even a seasonal name can fall.
May has now closed higher 7 years running. If anything it has sharpened recently — the last five Mays run ahead of the earlier years.
For a stock this dependable in May, the sharper question is the rest of the year — outside its strong stretch, the calendar gives far less to lean on. With returns that swing hard year to year, the signal is best held loosely.
Short answers on the stock's best month (May), its worst (February), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Yes, to a pronounced degree. Since 2016 its best month (May, +9.9%) has run well ahead of its worst (February, −4.9%) — the heatmap above shows how steady that gap has been year to year.
May has been the strongest, averaging +9.9% and closing higher in 8 of 10 years since 2016.
It's the weakest, averaging −4.9% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade