The takeaway
Navios Maritime Partners LP Unit shows a pronounced seasonal pattern over 10 years of data — strongest in April (+12.7%) and softest in May (−6.8%).
Right now
In July, the stock has risen 70% of years, averaging +2.9%, about +0.7 pts better than the S&P 500.
The full picture
Navios Maritime Partners LP Unit's most dependable month has been April, higher in 7 of 10 years; May has been its least reliable, up just 30% of the time.
| Year | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Win rate % | ||||||||||||
| Median return % | ||||||||||||
| 2025 | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | ||||||||||||
| 2023 | ||||||||||||
| 2022 | ||||||||||||
| 2021 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 | ||||||||||||
| 2019 | ||||||||||||
| 2018 | ||||||||||||
| 2017 | ||||||||||||
| 2016 |
Month by month
The stock's clearest edge over the S&P 500 lands in April (+11.1 pts); it has trailed the market most in May (−7.5 pts).
“vs S&P” is Navios Maritime Partners LP Unit’s average for a month minus the S&P 500’s average for that same month — isolating Navios Maritime Partners LP Unit’s own seasonal edge from broad market drift.
Reality check
Over the last 5 years, April has closed higher 60% of the time versus 70% across the last 10 years — the pattern is holding.
Figures are the typical (median) April return and how often it rose — the last 5 years versus the last 10(the heatmap’s default window). This verdict stays anchored to that 10-year window even if you zoom the chart, so it never disagrees with the badges above.
In plain English
The seasonal story is really one month's story — April. It has closed higher in 7 of 10 Aprils, a concentration the rest of the calendar can't touch.
Read it with one caveat: the average (+12.7%) runs well ahead of the median (+1.3%), so a handful of outsized years — not steady strength — do much of the lifting. That reliability comes with real swings, mind — even April ranges by 28.0% from year to year, so any single year can land far from the average. Better still, that strength is the stock's own and not just a buoyant market — April has outpaced the S&P 500 by +11.1 points on average. Few peers keep such company in April — the typical stock clears it just 55% of the time.
It doesn't stand entirely alone — January, June, and July have leaned firm as well, if less emphatically. The weaker half of the year is plainer: May has been the soft spot — the weakest of 4 months that average a loss (−6.8%), and the edge isn't year-round — the stock has trailed the S&P 500 in May, October, and February. Its roughest month on record was a −50.2% February in 2016 — a reminder of how hard even a seasonal name can fall.
Reassuringly, the tendency has held its shape: the recent five years still track the years behind them.
For a stock this dependable in April, the sharper question is the rest of the year — outside its strong stretch, the calendar gives far less to lean on. With returns that swing hard year to year, the signal is best held loosely.
Short answers on the stock's best month (April), its worst (May), and whether it really trades seasonally.
Yes, to a pronounced degree. Since 2016 its best month (April, +12.7%) has run well ahead of its worst (May, −6.8%) — the heatmap above shows how steady that gap has been year to year.
April has been the strongest, averaging +12.7% and closing higher in 7 of 10 years since 2016.
It's the weakest, averaging −6.8% — historically a soft spot, though it still varies from year to year.
Explore
These names have the strongest July track records on record — a starting point for comparison.
Before you trade